US will ‘not rehash’ claims GCHQ wiretapped Donald Trump

US will ‘not rehash’ claims GCHQ wiretapped Donald Trump

The US has concurred not to rehash guarantees the UK’s correspondences insight organization wiretapped Donald Trump amid the presidential decision battle.

GCHQ rejected charges made by White House squeeze secretary Sean Spicer, that it kept an eye on Mr Trump, as “garbage”.

No. 10 has been guaranteed by Mr Spicer he would not rehash the cases, which he refered to from US TV channel Fox News.

The White House has said that Mr Spicer was “essentially indicating open reports, not supporting a particular story”.

A representative for Prime Minister Theresa May said it had been clarified to US specialists the cases were “crazy and ought to have been disregarded”.

Previous outside secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind said it was insufficient to guarantee not to rehash the charge.

“That is not the same as saying it was trash in any case,” he told the BBC.

GCHQ rejected the assertions as “totally ludicrous”. The irregular move by the office to remark on the news came after Mr Spicer refered to cases first made on Fox News not long ago.

Mr Trump said Trump Tower in New York was under observation, however has given no confirmation to the claim.

The assertions of GCHQ contribution were at first made by previous judge Andrew Napolitano.

White House mollifies Trump wiretap claims

Did Obama truly wiretap Trump Tower?

Understanding into GCHQ’s internal workings

Mr Spicer cited Mr Napolitano as saying: “Three knowledge sources have educated Fox News that President Obama went outside the hierarchy of leadership.”

He said Mr Obama “didn’t utilize the NSA, he didn’t utilize the CIA, he didn’t utilize the FBI and he didn’t utilize the Department of Justice, he utilized GCHQ.

“What the hell is GCHQ? That is the initials for the British spying office. They have day in and day out access to the NSA database.”

A GCHQ representative stated: “Late charges made by media analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being made a request to direct “wiretapping” against the then president-elect are rubbish.

“They are completely absurd and ought to be overlooked.”

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-39300191

Comments are closed.